[Commentary on the original 'Adaptation and feasibility of the online version of the Fugl Meyer scale for the assessment of patients following cerebrovascular accidents']. / Comentario al original 'Adaptación y viabilidad de la versión telemática de la escala Fugl Meyer para la evaluación de pacientes tras accidentes cerebrovasculares.

TITLE: Comentario al original 'Adaptación y viabilidad de la versión telemática de la escala Fugl Meyer para la evaluación de pacientes tras accidentes cerebrovasculares.

Comentario al original ‘Adaptación y viabilidad de la versión telemática de la escala Fugl Meyer para la evaluación de pacientes tras accidentes cerebrovasculares / Commentary on the original 'Adaptation and feasibility of the online version of the Fugl Meyer scale for the assessment of patients following cerebrovascular accidents'

No disponible

Eficacia de la magnetoterapia en artrosis erosiva de manos. Un ensayo clínico / Efficacy of magnetotherapy in hand erosive osteoarthritis. A clinical trial

Introducción La artrosis erosiva es una patología infrecuente con tratamiento de escasa eficacia. A pesar de tratarse con magnetoterapia, no existe evidencia para su uso. Los objetivos son evaluar la eficacia de la magnetoterapia en pacientes con artrosis erosiva de manos en cuanto a dolor, comparándola con placebo, y determinar su seguridad. Método Estudio experimental prospectivo, aleatorizado, doble ciego formado por grupo experimental (GI: tratamiento con magnetoterapia, 15 sesiones de 20min 5días/semana consecutivos) y grupo control (GC: placebo). Previo al tratamiento, al final y a los 3meses se evaluó el dolor con Escala Visual Analógica (EVA). Secundariamente, funcionalidad (escala Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand [DASH]), rigidez (Índice Kapandji modificado), fuerza de prensión (dinamometría) y calidad de vida (cuestionario SF-36). Resultados De 29 pacientes valorados se excluyeron 10, quedando 19, todas mujeres con una edad media de 59años. Se aleatorizaron 10 al GI y 9 al GC, siendo comparables. Se observó un mayor porcentaje de pacientes en el GI en relación con el GC con control del dolor (EVA<6) postratamiento y a los 3meses (77,8% vs. 33,3%, p=0,1 y 83,3% vs. 33,3%, p=0,2, respectivamente) y una tendencia a disminuir el dolor en el GI a los 3meses (coeficiente de regresión: −2,1 (IC 95%: −5,7-1,5; p=0,2). No hubo más diferencias excepto mayor fuerza de prensión en GI tanto en mano dominante como no dominante (p=0,01 y p<0,05, respectivamente). No se presentaron eventos adversos ni efectos secundarios. Conclusión El tratamiento con magnetoterapia en pacientes con artrosis erosiva de manos es seguro y parece contribuir a una mejora clínica (AU)

Introduction Erosive arthritis is an unusual pathology. Despite using magnetotherapy as a treatment, there is no evidence supporting its use. The aim of the study is to evaluate magnetotherapy efficacy in patients suffering from hand erosive arthritis, compared to placebo, in terms of pain. Treatment safety will be also evaluated. Method Prospective experimental double-blind randomized study consisting of an intervention group (IG: treatment with magnetotherapy: 15 20-minute-sesions 5 consecutive days per week) and a control group (CG: placebo). Treatment efficacy was evaluated at the end and 3 months after. We used Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for assess pain. Secondarily, functionality (The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score), rigidity (Modified Kapandji Index), grip strength (dynamometry) and quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) were assessed. Results 29 patients were evaluated. Due to exclusion criteria, there were 19 patients left, all women with an average age of 59. After randomization, 10 were awarded to IG and 9 to CG, being both comparable groups. A higher percentage of patients with pain controlled (VAS<6) was found in IG post treatment and after 3-months (77.8% vs 33.3%, p=0.1 y 83.3% vs 33.3%, p=0.2; respectively). A tendency to decrease VAS for IG at 3-months (regression coefficient: −2.1 (95% CI: −5.7-1.5; p=0.2) was showed. There were no other statistically significant differences, except a higher dynamometry results in IG, in both hands (p<0.01 and p<0.04 respectively). There were neither adverse effects nor secondary effects. Conclusion Magnetotherapy treatment for hand erosive arthritis patients is safe and probably leads to clinical improvement (AU)

[Efficacy of magnetotherapy in hand erosive osteoarthritis. A clinical trial]. / Eficacia de la magnetoterapia en artrosis erosiva de manos. Un ensayo clínico.

INTRODUCTION: Erosive arthritis is an unusual pathology. Despite using magnetotherapy as a treatment, there is no evidence supporting its use. The aim of the study is to evaluate magnetotherapy efficacy in patients suffering from hand erosive arthritis, compared to placebo, in terms of pain. Treatment safety will be also evaluated. METHOD: Prospective experimental double-blind randomized study consisting of an intervention group (IG: treatment with magnetotherapy: 15 20-minute-sesions 5 consecutive days per week) and a control group (CG: placebo). Treatment efficacy was evaluated at the end and 3 months after. We used Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for assess pain. Secondarily, functionality (The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score), rigidity (Modified Kapandji Index), grip strength (dynamometry) and quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) were assessed. RESULTS: 29 patients were evaluated. Due to exclusion criteria, there were 19 patients left, all women with an average age of 59. After randomization, 10 were awarded to IG and 9 to CG, being both comparable groups. A higher percentage of patients with pain controlled (VAS<6) was found in IG post treatment and after 3-months (77.8% vs 33.3%, p=0.1 y 83.3% vs 33.3%, p=0.2; respectively). A tendency to decrease VAS for IG at 3-months (regression coefficient: -2.1 (95% CI: -5.7-1.5; p=0.2) was showed. There were no other statistically significant differences, except a higher dynamometry results in IG, in both hands (p<0.01 and p<0.04 respectively). There were neither adverse effects nor secondary effects. CONCLUSION: Magnetotherapy treatment for hand erosive arthritis patients is safe and probably leads to clinical improvement.

Rehabilitación en época de confinamiento / Rehabilitation during the lockdown

El sistema sanitario se encuentra ante una pandemia mundial en relación con la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Los planes de preparación para emergencias a menudo no consideran cuestiones específicas de rehabilitación para pacientes hospitalizados ni para ambulatorios, aunque la Organización Mundial de la Salud aconseja incluir a profesionales de rehabilitación lo antes posible. Los planes de contingencia de los Servicios de Rehabilitación deben realizarse en coordinación con las otras áreas asistenciales. En esta revisión, se ha resumido y analizado la información disponible basada en una búsqueda cuidadosa de la literatura científica de COVID-19 y en la experiencia de un entorno concreto, para planificar la continuidad asistencial de rehabilitación para todos los pacientes y para ayudar a los equipos de rehabilitación en este periodo de confinamiento /desconfinamiento incierto

The health system is facing a global pandemic due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Emergency plans often fail to consider specific rehabilitation issues, whether inpatient or outpatient, although the World Health Organisation advises the inclusion of rehabilitation professionals as soon as possible. The contingency plans of rehabilitation services must be carried out in coordination with the other healthcare areas. This review was prepared with the current available evidence on COVID-19 and was based on the experience of a specific environment, to plan the continuity of rehabilitation care for all patients and to help rehabilitation teams in this period of lockdown and uncertain lifting of restrictions

[Rehabilitation during the lockdown]. / Rehabilitación en época de confinamiento.

The health system is facing a global pandemic due to coronavirus disease 2019. Emergency plans often fail to consider specific rehabilitation issues, whether inpatient or outpatient, although the World Health Organization advises the inclusion of rehabilitation professionals as soon as possible. The contingency plans of rehabilitation services must be carried out in coordination with the other healthcare areas. This review was prepared with the current available evidence on coronavirus disease 2019 and was based on the experience of a specific environment, to plan the continuity of rehabilitation care for all patients and to help rehabilitation teams in this period of lockdown and uncertain lifting of restrictions.